Empowering Justice: For the first time in History, CJI Gavai Implements SC/ST Reservations in Supreme Court Hiring Process

In a first ever in history for India's judiciary, the Supreme Court has for the first time in history instructed reservations for Scheduled Tribes (ST) and Scheduled Castes (SC) in its own recruitment process. This historic turn, instigated by Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai, has significant ramifications not merely for the legal system, but for India's overall pursuit of social and economic justice. This is an important move because CJI Gavai is the second Chief Justice to be from the Scheduled Caste community, and this decision is a historic win for diversity and representation within India's highest judiciary. The reservation policy in the hiring process of the Supreme Court is an unprecedented display of commitment to a more inclusive and representative system of justice.

So far, the Indian judiciary itself has been criticized on relative homogeneity grounds, inter alia, by caste and socio-economic factors. This policy shift is aimed to close such gaps, in the sense that historically disadvantaged groups are given access to opportunities in the judiciary proportionate. By embracing this policy of reservation, the Supreme Court is letting its recruitment process keep pace with the lofty principles of justice, equality, and fairness in the Constitution. This article explores the background, reasoning, and widespread implications of this revolutionary exercise, why this policy change took place, what reception it's receiving, and what it bodes to justice and fairness in the Indian justice system. The action also sparks fundamental issues about the evolving role of affirmative action in India's institutions and leaves the door ajar for future reform in other parts of society.

Supreme Court of India adopts SC/ST reservations in staff recruitment for the first time.

The Historic Policy Shift: SC/ST Reservations

The Supreme Court on June 23, 2025, introduced a roster of reservations for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST) for the hiring of staff.

The decision was taken in an official circular that was issued by the Supreme Court Registrar on June 24. The Model Reservation Roster and Register for direct recruitment to various Supreme Court posts was put on the internal server of the Supreme Court, Supnet, from the date of issue, according to the circular. The circular also invited objections and representations from members of the personnel in case of any errors or inaccuracies in the roster. The transparency in the process is a stark change from the Supreme Court's in-house recruitment process.

The Personal Touch of CJI: Leading from the Front

CJI BR Gavai's decision to implement this reservation policy is not just a matter of policy but also a success tale in his own right. Being the second CJI belonging to the Scheduled Castes community, his tenure has ushered in waves of overdue reforms that are inclusive and representative even at the very highest rungs of seats of power. His experiences and background most likely prompted him to bring India's judiciary as representative as India's diverse social tapestry.

The order is all the more significant in the light of the absence of any official representation to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in the appointments to the staff of the Supreme Court thus far. The order is a milestone on the path to inclusive governance, led by CJI Gavai and making the judiciary a representative institution.

Why Is This Move So Important?

For the first time in India's 75 years of independence, India's highest court is officially acting to ensure equal opportunities of employment for SC/ST communities within its own organization.

Hitherto, the Supreme Court has never had any concrete affirmative action, leaving a gargantuan gap of representation. The absence of such provisions has been contentious for a long time on the grounds that it was traditionally believed that the judiciary as an institution committed to justice, equity, and equality should reflect the diversity of the society which it was meant to serve. In India, reservations by caste have been employed as a broad-brush tool to retaliate against systemic injustices and grant historically disadvantaged groups a level playing field in order to achieve social and economic progress.

By implementing reservations in the Supreme Court itself, the judiciary is conveying affirmatively that it is serious about the ideals of justice and equality embedded in the Constitution. The policy aims not only to correct the historical discrimination of SC/ST communities from the top echelons of society but also that their voice be heard and their perspective be accorded appropriate weightage in the administration of justice. Besides this, this action is reasserting the doctrine that access to justice cannot continue to be the luxury of the powerful.

By providing greater opportunities to the less represented within its own folds, the Supreme Court is re-establishing itself as a protector of the Constitution and a defender of social justice. The decision, long in the making as it is, is a signal that the judiciary has no hesitation in leading from the front and performing in advance for bringing about equity and representation to all segments of society. The Model Reservation Roster: Some Important Facts

Roster reservation has been proposed for a series of posts in the Supreme Court, i.e., Senior Personal Assistants, Junior Court Attendants, Junior Court Assistants, Assistant Librarians, and Chamber Attendants, etc. The SC category will be provided 15% share and the ST category will receive 7.5% for employment posts of these ranks under the new policy.

This is no superficial list; it formulates and enumerates definite instructions for direct appointments of SC/ST group personnel, thus ensuring their representation in the judicial process on an administrative level. These are meaningful positions in the Supreme Court administration, and inclusion of downtrodden group representatives in these assignments ensures a more representative and inclusive judiciary.

Present position of backward classes and backward communities representation in Supreme Court of India

This move is of monumental importance for several reasons:

Historical Importance: Supreme Court has been one of the few institutions which have never had a slightest official policy of reservation of SC/ST candidates in the past 75 years. In this, walls that have stood tall for decades for being equally represented are brought down.

Social Justice and Equality: Caste reservations serve to equalize the opportunity platform for groups that have suffered centuries of institutionalized discrimination. Through the allowance of SC/ST groups' entry into the central administrative order of the Supreme Court, the policy allows them to be included in decision-making opportunities that shape the nation's justice system.

Leadership by Example: The action taken by CJI Gavai is a template that the rest of India's institutions can embrace. If the judiciary, as the pillar of the democratic system, can make such changes, then it spurs other domains to do the same and makes many professional environments more inclusive.

Improved Access to Justice: Greater involvement of the people belonging to weaker sections of society in the delivery of justice makes the system of justice more accessible to everyone. The judiciary becomes linked with and sensitive towards the interests and concerns of weaker sections of society.

The Greater Impact on India's Judicial System

The move to institute SC/ST reservations in Supreme Court recruitment has the potential to leave behind an eternal legacy in India's judiciary. It brings more diversity and participation to one of the most essential pillars of the government and adds more legitimacy to the judiciary.

Besides this, it can act as a precedent for other Indian institutions to do the same. For example, public sector undertakings, schools, and even other government ministries could begin reconsidering their recruitment policy and take more progressive steps towards the marginalized groups.

Challenges and Criticisms

Even though the decision to take reservations for SC/ST candidates to the Supreme Court is a step in the right direction in the revolutionary context, it is not without flaws.

It will be argued that the transition will undermine the meritocratic component of appointments, especially at the higher echelons of the system like the judiciary. Others also worry that the introduction of reservations will result in applicants being selected on the basis of caste rather than qualification or experience. But in this plan, nobody realizes that diversity and merit are complementary and not opposing forces.

Rather, diversity provides a different perspective of merit in the sense of broadening one's vision and giving a broader view to one's mind for understanding issues at hand better. Reservations are not the kind where compromise is made on the quality of candidates but it only gives meritorious candidates belonging to SC/ST categories an equal opportunity to compete for the said positions. The very concept of an equal society is to give equal opportunities to everyone, irrespective of background, and the incorporation of marginalized groups within the judiciary makes it a more powerful legal system because it is a more powerful representation of the pluralist society it represents. The Road Ahead: A Step Towards More Reforms? While placing the reservation policy into action at the Supreme Court level is in the right direction, it is just a step in a pretty long process to attain equality at the level of the Indian legal system.

Other areas also need to be extensively overhauled with respect to higher representation of women, persons with disability, and other weaker sections at the judiciary level. These too face barriers which disqualify them from receiving opportunities of power and influence in the legal system. Along with this, diversity not only needs to be extended to appointments but also disseminated into the working culture of the judiciary.

This work environment needs to remain respectful and inclusive of individuals from all segments of society.

Second, these reforms need to be ensured to be implemented, adhered to, and conveyed to other arms of the judiciary, even externally. The judiciary has a role in social justice that is unmatched, and in drafting even more inclusive policy, it has the potential to be a great model for other parts of Indian society. It must be made a point properly so that diversity is incorporated at every level so that the legal system is not only representative but also an active champion of equality.

Conclusion

A New Era of Judicial Inclusivity Adoption of the SC/ST reservation policy by CJI Gavai in Supreme Court recruitments is a start of a new era for India's judicial system. This significant advance ensures that the country's most important legal institution is representative of citizens. This also sends a strong message in terms of the need for inclusion and social justice in the governing structure, with other institutions being encouraged to follow suit.

In the long term, this policy can go a long way in transforming not only the judiciary but the nature of India's legal and governmental systems themselves. Giving power to members of oppressed groups and making them capable of thriving is bringing the country closer to the promises of an inclusive democracy. As the judiciary expands and matures, policies such as this one will be instrumental in delivering justice to everyone.

Empower Your Legal Practice with AI – Join Our Free Webinar!

Are you a legal professional looking to boost your efficiency and stay ahead in a competitive field? Discover the power of Lawttorney.AI – the cutting-edge tool designed to streamline legal research, automate tasks, and enhance productivity.

👉 Don't miss out! Reserve your spot in our FREE webinar and experience the future of legal practice today. Register Now